michaelkuc6/blog_os
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os.git synced 2025-12-16 22:37:49 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix internal links

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philipp Oppermann
2017-06-09 14:25:44 +02:00
parent 66e10facc1
commit 945a766f0c
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
blog/content/extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/03-returning-from-exceptions/index.md
View File

@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Instead of the expected _“It did not crash”_ message after the breakpoint ex
### Debugging
Let's debug it using GDB. For that we execute `make debug` in one terminal (which starts QEMU with the `-s -S` flags) and then `make gdb` (which starts and connects GDB) in a second terminal. For more information about GDB debugging, check out our [Set Up GDB] guide.
[Set Up GDB]: ./extra/set-up-gdb.md
[Set Up GDB]: ./extra/set-up-gdb/index.md
First we want to check if our `iretq` was successful. Therefore we set a breakpoint on the `println!("It did not crash line!")` statement in `src/lib.rs`. Let's assume that it's on line 61:
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Unfortunately, Rust does not support such a calling convention. It was [proposed
[interrupt calling conventions]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1275
[Naked functions]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1201-naked-fns.md
[naked fn post]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/better-exception-messages.md#naked-functions
[naked fn post]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/02-better-exception-messages/index.md#naked-functions
### A naked wrapper function

4
blog/content/posts/02-entering-longmode/index.md
View File

@@ -494,8 +494,8 @@ _Congratulations_! You have successfully wrestled through this CPU configuration
#### One Last Thing
Above, we reloaded the code segment register `cs` with the new GDT offset. However, the data segment registers `ss`, `ds`, `es`, `fs`, and `gs` still contain the data segment offsets of the old GDT. This isn't necessarily bad, since they're ignored by almost all instructions in 64-bit mode. However, there are a few instructions that expect a valid data segment descriptor _or the null descriptor_ in those registers. An example is the the [iretq] instruction that we'll need in the [_Returning from Exceptions_] post.
[iretq]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/returning-from-exceptions.md#the-iretq-instruct/indexion
[_Returning from Exceptions_]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/returning-from-exceptions.md
[iretq]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/03-returning-from-exceptions/index.md#the-iretq-instruction
[_Returning from Exceptions_]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/03-returning-from-exceptions/index.md
To avoid future problems, we reload all data segment registers with null:

2
blog/content/posts/07-remap-the-kernel/index.md
View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Also, we will use the [information about kernel sections] to map the various sec
## Preparation
There are many things that can go wrong when we switch to a new table. Therefore it's a good idea to [set up a debugger][set up gdb]. You should not need it when you follow this post, but it's good to know how to debug a problem when it occurs[^fn-debug-notes].
[set up gdb]: ./extra/set-up-gdb.md
[set up gdb]: ./extra/set-up-gdb/index.md
We also update the `Page` and `Frame` types to make our lives easier. The `Page` struct gets some derived traits: