michaelkuc6/blog_os
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os.git synced 2025-12-17 14:57:49 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix internal links

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philipp Oppermann
2017-06-09 14:25:44 +02:00
parent 66e10facc1
commit 945a766f0c
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
blog/content/extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/03-returning-from-exceptions/index.md
View File

@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Instead of the expected _“It did not crash”_ message after the breakpoint ex
### Debugging
Let's debug it using GDB. For that we execute `make debug` in one terminal (which starts QEMU with the `-s -S` flags) and then `make gdb` (which starts and connects GDB) in a second terminal. For more information about GDB debugging, check out our [Set Up GDB] guide.
[Set Up GDB]: ./extra/set-up-gdb.md
[Set Up GDB]: ./extra/set-up-gdb/index.md
First we want to check if our `iretq` was successful. Therefore we set a breakpoint on the `println!("It did not crash line!")` statement in `src/lib.rs`. Let's assume that it's on line 61:
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Unfortunately, Rust does not support such a calling convention. It was [proposed
[interrupt calling conventions]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1275
[Naked functions]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1201-naked-fns.md
[naked fn post]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/better-exception-messages.md#naked-functions
[naked fn post]: ./extra/handling-exceptions-with-naked-fns/02-better-exception-messages/index.md#naked-functions
### A naked wrapper function