From 4b3fbd27cceee36d2e2f07d47b4a63adc67c085e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Funfoolsuzi Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 00:26:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in 05-cpu-exceptions (#653) Thanks for the great tutorial. Here is a typo I found. --- blog/content/second-edition/posts/05-cpu-exceptions/index.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/content/second-edition/posts/05-cpu-exceptions/index.md b/blog/content/second-edition/posts/05-cpu-exceptions/index.md index b4a5c124..f41d5b4f 100644 --- a/blog/content/second-edition/posts/05-cpu-exceptions/index.md +++ b/blog/content/second-edition/posts/05-cpu-exceptions/index.md @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ Note how this solution requires no `unsafe` blocks. The `lazy_static!` macro doe ### Running it -The last step for making exceptions work in our kernel it to call the `init_idt` function from our `main.rs`. Instead of calling it directly, we introduce a general `init` function in our `lib.rs`: +The last step for making exceptions work in our kernel is to call the `init_idt` function from our `main.rs`. Instead of calling it directly, we introduce a general `init` function in our `lib.rs`: ```rust // in src/lib.rs