michaelkuc6/blog_os
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os.git synced 2025-12-16 14:27:49 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed typos in post Allocating Frames

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Fok kan
2016-01-09 01:28:13 -05:00
parent 43a86e7b86
commit 376ab13f1a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
posts/2015-11-15-allocating-frames.md
View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ let boot_info = unsafe{ multiboot2::load(multiboot_information_address) };
let memory_map_tag = boot_info.memory_map_tag().expect("Memory map tag required"); let memory_map_tag = boot_info.memory_map_tag().expect("Memory map tag required");
println!("memory areas:"); println!("memory areas:");
for area in emory_map_tag.memory_areas() { for area in memory_map_tag.memory_areas() {
println!(" start: 0x{:x}, length: 0x{:x}", area.base_addr, area.length); println!(" start: 0x{:x}, length: 0x{:x}", area.base_addr, area.length);
} }
``` ```
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ let mut frame_allocator = memory::AreaFrameAllocator::new(
Now we can test it by adding some frame allocations: Now we can test it by adding some frame allocations:
```rust ```rust
println!("{:?}", frame_allocator.allocate_frame()) println!("{:?}", frame_allocator.allocate_frame());
``` ```
You will see that the frame number starts at `0` and increases steadily, but the kernel and Multiboot frames are left out (you need to allocate many frames to see this since the kernel starts at frame 256). You will see that the frame number starts at `0` and increases steadily, but the kernel and Multiboot frames are left out (you need to allocate many frames to see this since the kernel starts at frame 256).