From 00fedc801ede88da176ad2085977ec7eaeb672ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philipp Oppermann <dev@phil-opp.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:03:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use `LinkedListAllocator::lock` instead of
 `self.inner.lock()`

---
 src/allocator/linked_list.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/allocator/linked_list.rs b/src/allocator/linked_list.rs
index 3753511e..a03b6f34 100644
--- a/src/allocator/linked_list.rs
+++ b/src/allocator/linked_list.rs
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ unsafe impl GlobalAlloc for Locked<LinkedListAllocator> {
     unsafe fn alloc(&self, layout: Layout) -> *mut u8 {
         // perform layout adjustments
         let (size, align) = LinkedListAllocator::size_align(layout);
-        let mut allocator = self.inner.lock();
+        let mut allocator = self.lock();
 
         if let Some((region, alloc_start)) = allocator.find_region(size, align) {
             let alloc_end = alloc_start.checked_add(size).expect("overflow");
@@ -140,6 +140,6 @@ unsafe impl GlobalAlloc for Locked<LinkedListAllocator> {
         // perform layout adjustments
         let (size, _) = LinkedListAllocator::size_align(layout);
 
-        self.inner.lock().add_free_region(ptr as usize, size)
+        self.lock().add_free_region(ptr as usize, size)
     }
 }